| |
 |
Opinions |
 |
|
| |
FDA Statement on Medical Marijuana |
|
| |
The government tries its best to keep control, it really does. But this is one of those issues that makes it hard to keep a straight face when you hear the offical line. So we provided a virtual translation of the latest FDA release. |
|
| |
| |
|
|
| |
Claims have been advanced [for thousands of years] asserting smoked marijuana has a value in treating various medical conditions. Some have argued that herbal marijuana is a safe and effective medication and that it should be made available to people who suffer from a number of ailments upon a doctor's recommendation, even though it is not an approved drug. [And it is always important to do what one is told, not necessarily what is right.] Marijuana is listed in schedule I of the Controlled Substances Act (CSA), the most restrictive schedule. The Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA), which administers the CSA, continues to support that placement [despite all logic or reason] and FDA concurred because [it believes] marijuana met the three criteria for placement in Schedule I under 21 U.S.C. 812(b)(1) (e.g., marijuana has a high potential for abuse [like any other food or drug], has no currently accepted medical use in treatment in the United States [because we refuse to recognize it], and has a lack of accepted safety for use under medical supervision [despite the fact that it is the one substance that is medically impossible to overdose on and there is no historical record of such an occurrence.] ). Furthermore, there is currently sound evidence that smoked marijuana [like cigarettes] is harmful [and legalizing it would only allow it to be consumed in a less harmful form]. A past evaluation by several Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) agencies, including the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA) and National Institute for Drug Abuse (NIDA), concluded that no sound scientific studies supported medical use of marijuana for treatment in the United States, and no animal or human data supported the safety or efficacy of marijuana for general medical use. [It didn't provide any reason to ban it as a substance either, yet we'll just continue to pursue that route.] There are alternative FDA-approved medications [that are available at a much greater cost from established pharmaceutical companies] in existence for treatment of many of the proposed uses of smoked marijuana. FDA is the sole Federal agency [sanctioned by God from above] that approves drug products as safe and effective for intended indications. The Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic (FD&C) Act requires that new drugs be shown to be safe and effective for their intended use before being marketed in this country [regardless of whether we can show any harmful effects or not]. FDA's drug approval process requires well-controlled clinical trials that provide the necessary scientific data upon which FDA makes its approval and labeling decisions. [Thousands of years of historical evidence is completely irrelevant.] If a drug product is to be marketed, disciplined, systematic, scientifically conducted trials are the best means to obtain data to ensure that drug is safe and effective when used as indicated. Efforts that seek to bypass the FDA drug approval process would not serve the interests of public health because they might expose patients to unsafe and ineffective [or unmarketable] drug products. FDA has not approved smoked marijuana for any condition or disease indication [and we're the FDA so we say so]. A growing number of states have passed voter referenda (or legislative actions) making smoked marijuana available for a variety of medical conditions upon a doctor's recommendation [because they are somehow under the mistaken impression that that's how this country works]. These measures are inconsistent with efforts to ensure that medications undergo the rigorous scientific scrutiny of the FDA approval process and are proven safe and effective under the standards of the FD&C Act. Accordingly, FDA, as the federal agency responsible for reviewing the safety and efficacy of drugs, DEA as the federal agency charged with enforcing the CSA, and the Office of National Drug Control Policy, as the federal coordinator of drug control policy, do not support the use of smoked marijuana for medical purposes. [since recreation and/or piece of mind are not supported as "medical purposes"] [Do what we say, never mind how little sense it makes.] [Yours in the Fuehrer,] [Colonel Klink] ####
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
| |
other items in this group |
|
| | Primary Capitalism 01.13.08 by Mark Steyn (National Review Online) | | | | | Something to think about in these political times - change. Everyone talks about change, but no one in the record industry seems to. This columnist makes this great connection between politics and the record business. | |
| | Steve Jobs and the digital rights bugaboo 02.06.07 by John C. Dvorak (MarketWatch) | | | | | He's right, the music industry is strangling itself | |
| | FDA Statement on Medical Marijuana 04.20.06 by FDA (translated by RattleHead Staff) (FDA) | | | | | The government tries its best to keep control, it really does. But this is one of those issues that makes it hard to keep a straight face when you hear the offical line. So we provided a virtual translation of the latest FDA release. | |
| | How Record Labels Buy Radioplay 10.08.02 by Eric Boehlert (salon.com) | | | | | Does radio seem bad these days? Do all the hits sound the same, all the stars seem like cookie cutouts of one another? It's because they do, and they are. | |
| | Illustrated Guide to the AOL/Time Warner Merger 10.01.02 by rattlehead (unknown) | | | | | Illustrated Guide to the AOL/Time Warner Merger | |
| | The Spiritual Death of Music 06.01.02 by Vic Thrill (Vic Thrill) | | | | | Music was my jet engine. Music was my time machine. Music was my teletransport to non-physical emotion. It made my body more energy than mass. | |
| | The Problem With Music 01.01.02 by Steve Albini (Steve Albini) | | | | | Whenever I talk to a band who are about to sign with a major label, I always end up thinking of them in a particular context. I imagine a trench, about four feet wide and five feet deep, maybe sixty yards long, filled with runny, decaying shit. I imagine these people, some of them good friends, some of them barely acquaintances, at one end of this trench. | |
| | Only Six CDs a Year 08.09.01 by Richard Menta () | | | | | "Consumers and labels are at war". That is a direct quote from Webnoize's director of research Lee Black about the state of the record industry, an amazing statement punctuated by the sad fact that it is an accurate one. | |
| | Like Having Big Brother in Your Stereo 07.26.99 by Jon Iverson (Jon Iverson) | | | | | The Secure Digital Music Initiative (SDMI) appears to be the antidote to many a record executive's worst audio poison: legions of young music fans downloading digital audio files off the Internet and passing them around with no regard to copyright restrictions. | |
| | A Chance to Break the Pop Stranglehold 05.09.99 by Neil Strauss (NY Times) | | | | | There are two great pop music dreams. And they usually follow each other, like marriage and divorce. The first great dream is to get together with friends in a basement or garage, write songs, make music, feel the magic and perform at local clubs until a big record label rushes in waving a contract. And then the label takes care of the rest: hit singles, arena shows, limos, parties, a new house for mom. But the dream, even for those few who actually get to live it, has usually been a nightmare. | |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
This group contains opinion pieces from various sources found online... usually about news items, but all about things important to musicians. |
|
| |
|
|
|